My Ramblings
Adobe Flash Sustainable?
Adobe Flash has become apart of our daily web browsing as much as HTML has. But is it as important? Not really.
Flash has had the potential to become something quite great but the most useful thing it has achieved is being the standard for web video and some good online applications. Almost all web video is played through a video player running on flash. Probably it’s second biggest use is ads. Almost all the moving ads on the web today is built on flash even, website’s have been created using just flash.
“So with all the potential that flash has why isn’t it gaining web greatness?” Because its slow, even on modern Intel core 2 duo processors, after having a few videos open at the same time the computer can start to lag. Also normally when a website has been built using flash it takes forever to load and it just doesn’t feel as clean to use as the alternative.
“So why not something else?” Well their isn’t really any other options. Sure you can embed a Quicktime or a Windows Media video but it just doesn’t have the flexibility or features you can implement with creating your own flash video player. “Silverlight?” I don’t have enough experience with Silverlight to comment on it.
It’s not all bad. Flash applications mainly video players have been worked on and worked on most notable Youtube and Viddler’s video players. They both load quick and most of the time run great and have great features like annotations and time line comments. But they both suffer from the same problem and it’s how resource hungry they are. Just decoding flash is just not optimised well enough and his all lays on adobe. Also flash video isn’t a small file. Can be quite large.
“So the future is gloomy?” Actually no, and this is the whole reason I am writing this post, HTML 5, the new revision of HTML. A couple of it’s new features are audio and video. Youtube is demoing it here and I found it quite great. My CPU didn’t spike and for a beta product it was quite nice to use, I could use the video slider and it didn’t skip around (Youtube has fixed this to some extent but it still exists in it’s flash player).
“Great HTML 5 it is then.” ummm no, well not yet. HTML 5 is still quite new and the players still need to be built and popularity needs to be gained. The player that Youtube was demoing had no more features than a Quicktime embed.
Hopefully soon all the major video hosts will follow Youtube’s lead and start using HTML 5 because it sure seems much better than flash. I don’t think flash will die well not in the fore seeable future, their still are many online applications that use flash and you can’t forget flash games but adobe really need to optimise it.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Nick Ayre on January 22, 2010 at 11:51 PM, and is filed under Applications, Featured, Internet. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |
Comments are closed.




about 2 years ago
Great post, Nick!
I swear Flash didn't used to be as power hungry as it is these days. I'm not sure if that's because Flash has become more bloated, or because videos in general are higher quality these days.
HTML5 is exciting, and so is the fact that the most recent browsers can display OGG Theora videos natively.
Flash was never intended for video. It was intended for games and animations. Sure, Flash videos can look great, but it wasn't meant to handle the complex data found in video.
I do hope the web begins to rely less on Flash, but it's going to be a very long transition.
about 2 years ago
Thanks Derek, it sure does make sense that it was never intended for video. After all these years it's still just not right. But flash does seem to work will in ads and the little games that are in ads work well. I guess we will see where the future takes us.